Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About
    Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
  • On the
    Farm
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the
    Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webinars
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S
    Award
  • Search

How to Keep Agricultural Water Safe

June 1, 2018 • By Lori Valigra

  • Tweet
Print-Friendly Version

The Homer C. Thompson Vegetable Research Farm, Freeville, N.Y., utilizes an irrigation pump that pulls water from Fall Creek for use in irrigation and vegetable production.

Consumer preferences for fresh rather than processed produce and vegetables over the past 20 years are causing government regulators and scientists to direct more research toward assuring water used in agriculture is clean.

You Might Also Like
  • Extended Compliance Dates for Agricultural Water Provisions
  • Simplifying Produce Safety Rule’s Ag Water Use
  • Faster, Simpler Assay to Detect Bacteria
Also By This Author
  • Maine Law Gives Local Control Over Local Foods, Food Safety
ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Water is the main contributor to transporting pathogens, especially post-harvest, says Luke LaBorde, PhD, a professor of food science at Penn State University in State College, Pennsylvania. Among other work, Dr. LaBorde focuses on Good Agricultural Practices training.

“The closer to the consumer’s mouth, the higher the consideration is of the quality of water used in agriculture,” notes Dr. LaBorde. “Even insects can transfer bacteria sources of contamination from the field to the consumer.”

Agricultural water proposed standards are covered under the Produce Safety rule in the FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The proposed rule establishes testing frequency, microbial limits, and remedial methods.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

If pathogens are detected, a farmer may stop using water from a particular source, for example using well water instead of surface water, Dr. LaBorde says. Or, the farmer can treat the water with sanitizer or change watering to a drip irrigation system where only the roots and not the plant leaves are exposed to water.

Municipal water is the safest, followed by ground water in wells. Surface water in canals and streams is subject to fouling by wildlife. The main risks for produce are runoff, the water source, and animal droppings. So while surface water can be used in a drip irrigation system, for example, it may not be good for washing produce after harvest, when well or spring water is best, says Dr. LaBorde.

Farmers also need to be aware of what is upstream from them. For instance, they need to be aware if a new dairy operation has been set up or if a summer home with a faulty septic system is back in use.

AI and Algorithms

Martin Wiedmann, PhD, Gellert Family Professor in Food Safety at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, is taking a high-tech approach to managing surface water use and to identify when water is at increased risk of having pathogens. He and his colleagues are developing algorithms and mathematical approaches to minimize risks.

Field associates using a multi-parameter YSI probe to work on a tailwater study for the University of California, Davis, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Managing surface water is a hot issue, says Dr. Wiedmann.

“One day the water at a certain point may be pathogen free and the next, it may not,” he explains. “The effect of rain can depend on what the land upstream looks like, whether it has farms or weekend houses with old, failing septic systems. So the water may be okay Monday through Friday, but not Saturday or Sunday.”

Dr. Wiedmann is using a GPS map to characterize what is happening upstream from a farm to predict higher or lower risk and to help farmers decide when to treat water or use an alternative source.

He says the FSMA rules are generic, but his approach is precision agriculture based on algorithms and using artificial intelligence to make predictions about water quality in specific areas on specific days.

“FSMA is one size fits all,” he says. “This [ours] is a better way to manage water quality. We’ll take precision agriculture to precision food safety at the field level.”

In the western United States, water conservation also figures into the picture. Researchers at the University of California, Davis, are studying the quality of tailwater, irrigation runoff from a field into a reservoir or pond, for reuse in pre-irrigation and germination.

“It’s very rare to detect pathogens in tailwater,” says Michael Cahn, PhD, farm advisor, irrigation and water resources at UC Davis’ Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources in Salinas, California. His group has been testing five reservoirs and ponds in the Salinas Valley over the past year to evaluate the food safety risks of using tailwater for irrigating leafy green crops using conventional irrigation and production practices. They checked the chemical, physical, and microbiological characteristics of tailwater and well water, looking at nutrients, pH, salinity, dissolved organic carbon, E. coli, coliform bacteria, and Salmonella.

They found that tailwater from the fields did not present more risk than well water despite containing more nutrients and dissolved organic compounds. The group also discovered that generic E. coli survived longer in well water than in tailwater. The survival of pathogenic E. coli and Salmonella in soil and on lettuce leaves was similar for tailwater and well water. Their final report will be published by the Center for Produce Safety.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: eUpdate, FSMA, Pathogen Control, Testing Tagged With: Agricultural water, irrigation, Produce Safety rule, tailwater

You Might Also Like:
  • Extended Compliance Dates for Agricultural Water Provisions
  • Simplifying Produce Safety Rule’s Ag Water Use
  • Faster, Simpler Assay to Detect Bacteria
  • Color Test for E. coli Captures Coveted Grand Prize

About Lori Valigra

Lori Valigra writes about science, technology, and business for general and specialty news outlets in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, including coverage of the "farm to fork" movement and food safety. She’s been involved in several media startups, and had articles published by The Boston Globe, Reuters, Science magazine, and others. She holds an MS in science journalism from Boston University and a BS in medical writing from University of Pittsburgh. She won numerous journalism fellowships and awards, including the Knight Science Journalism Fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lori enjoys bicycling, snowshoeing, gardening, and traveling. She lives in the western mountains of Maine. Reach her at lvaligra@gmail.com.

View more by this author»

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

October/November 2019

  • Issue Articles »
  • Current Issue PDF »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Managing Change as a Food Safety Professional

… [Read More]

Previous posts »

Paid Partner Content

Avoiding Overwhelming Product Recall Costs

Innovative food safety inspection systems are being developed in Germany. Learn more about the latest technologies from Bizerba and benefit from our free guidelines ensuring consistent food production safety.

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Cay Thi Queentrees Food USA Recalls Poultry Products
    • Padrino Foods, LLC Recalls Beef Tamales
    • Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc. Recalls Poultry Products
    • Rastelli Bros., Inc. Recalls Meat Products
    View more »
    • Researchers Uncover Science Behind Using UV Light to Disarm Pathogens
    • In Memoriam: Daniel Y. C. Fung, PhD
    • E. coli Illness Linked to Romaine Lettuce Expands
    • Salmonella Outbreak and Ground Beef Recall Stir Transparency Debate
    • FDA Extends Deadline for Supply-Chain Approval
    View more »

Polls

How interested is your company in cannabis testing for its food/beverage products?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • Food Authenticity Testing with Agilent 6546 LC/Q-TOF and MassHunter Classifier

View More Whitepapers »

On-Demand Webinars

  • Reduce Non-Recyclable Materials
  • Why a Food Safety Culture Is Critical to Your Business

View More Webinars »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Targeted list rental/3rd Party emails / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 2399-1399

Wiley

This site uses cookies: Find out more.