Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About
    Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
  • On the
    Farm
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the
    Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webinars
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S
    Award
  • Search

Public-Private Sector Working in Harmony

January 5, 2017 • By Ted Agres

  • Tweet
Print-Friendly Version

As the global food chain becomes more intertwined and as pressures to enhance food safety grow, government regulators in such diverse countries as the U.S., China, Canada, and Mexico are seeking to strengthen and streamline their inspection activities by leveraging private-sector audit and certification activities.

You Might Also Like
  • Contract Labs Eye FSMA’s Impact
  • FSMA Merges with Your Food Safety Program
  • 3 Waivers to FSMA Transportation Rule
Explore this issue
February/March 2017
Also by this Author
  • Opening the Regulatory Floodgates Two Years After FSMA Passage
ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The presumption is that private certification schemes, such as those recognized by the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) or developed by the International Standards Organization (ISO) can help food facilities meet or exceed national food safety laws. Thus, food companies that have been audited and certified by organizations such as the SQF Institute, BRC Global Standards, or FSSC 22000 are highly likely to be in compliance with government food safety requirements. This would allow regulators to focus their limited inspection resources on unaudited companies, considered more likely to have food safety problems than audited and certified firms.

Canada is in the process of implementing a new certification policy that would tailor inspection and oversight activities to private audits. “Where companies are certified to be in good standing to a scheme that we’ve assessed, we will give them credit,” said Mark Burgham, senior director for program policy integration at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

The audit credit would be entered into an algorithm that CFIA created, which also includes the firm’s compliance history, its inherent product and process safety risks, international intelligence, and other factors. Outputs from the algorithm “will influence the level of inspection, the frequency of inspection, or how we target specific direction to our inspectors,” Burgham told a GFSI-convened briefing in Washington, D.C. in November 2016.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In a pilot project, GFSI benchmarked schemes “met or exceeded” Canadian food safety standards for preventive controls, Burgham said. While CFIA will neither endorse nor recognize any specific private certification scheme, “there is recognition of great things going in industry that we need to understand better and ensure that we leverage,” he added. “So we will be looking at matching the highest risks with how we respond to them.”

Convergence with FSMA

“If you have a GFSI-benchmarked certification, you are very close to being compliant with FSMA [Food Safety Modernization Act],” said Mike Robach, chairman of GFSI’s board of directors and vice president for corporate food safety and regulatory affairs at Cargill Inc. “That’s the way we’ve prepared for it both with Cargill in the U.S. and in our facilities outside of the U.S. that export to the U.S.,” he told conference attendees.

In July 2016, Robach and other GFSI officials met with Stephen Ostroff, MD, FDA deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, to discuss a pilot project that would compare GFSI’s benchmarking requirements against FSMA regulations. As part of this effort, GFSI commissioned The Acheson Group, founded by David Acheson, MD, former FDA associate commissioner for foods, to conduct a side-by-side comparison of FSMA’s final preventive controls rule with GFSI’s new Version 7, due to be issued in January 2017. GFSI had planned to discuss the results of that analysis with the FDA in early 2017, Robach said.

“We hope and believe that given the alignment between GFSI and FSMA that there is a role for GFSI to play in demonstrating compliance with the new law as one of several risk-based criteria in compliance, just as we’ve seen with Canada,” Karil L. Kochenderfer, GFSI’s North American representative, tells Food Quality & Safety magazine.

The preventive controls rule (Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food ) requires U.S. and foreign firms that manufacture, process, pack, or hold human food to have written plans that identify hazards, specify steps to minimize or prevent those hazards, identify monitoring and recording procedures, and specify actions that will be taken to correct problems that arise. FDA has the authority to evaluate these plans and inspect facilities to ensure the plans are being followed.

Pages: 1 2 3 Single Page

Filed Under: FSMA, Guidelines & Regulations, Regulatory Tagged With: Food Quality, Food Safety, Food Safety Modernization Act, FSMA, global food chainIssue: February/March 2017

You Might Also Like:
  • Contract Labs Eye FSMA’s Impact
  • FSMA Merges with Your Food Safety Program
  • 3 Waivers to FSMA Transportation Rule
  • FDA Issues Final Rules on Produce Safety, Imported Foods

About Ted Agres

Ted Agres is an award-winning writer who covers food safety regulatory and legislative issues from the nation’s capital in the Washington Report column. He has 40 years of experience in reporting on issues such as health policy, medical technology, and pharmaceutical development. He holds an MBA from Johns Hopkins University and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Chicago. He enjoys playing the piano, amateur radio, and paintball. He lives in Laurel, MD. Reach him at tedagres@yahoo.com.

View more by this author»

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

February/March 2019

  • Issue Articles »
  • Current Issue PDF »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Conducting Impactful Internal Audits Beyond the Checklist

How intuitive methods, such as data visualization, enable the ability to both observe and listen objectively.

Previous posts »

Paid Partner Content

PURE Hard Surface

EPA registered food contact surface sanitizer and disinfectant delivers broad spectrum power to eliminate dangerous pathogens

Transport Sanitation Compliance

Disinfection application methodology ensures full coverage for all motor and rail vehicles, and is FSMA compliant

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Sid Wainer and Son Recalls Jansal Valley Dukkah Due to Glass Pieces
    • Birdseed Food Recalls Craft Granola Goldenola Turmeric & Ginger for Undeclared Cashews
    • World Waters Recalls Select 12 Packs Due Soft Plastic Pieces
    • VICS Acquisition Recalls Chicken Due to Undeclared Allergens
    • Frito-Lay Recalls Stacy’s Simply Naked Pita Chips Due to Undeclared Allergen
    View more »
    • Climate Change Could Make Food Less Safe
    • FDA Releases Report on 2018 E. coli Outbreak Tied to Romaine Lettuce
    • Study: Fruit Juices Contain High Levels of Heavy Metals
    • International Push to Improve Food Safety
    • How Consumer Perception of Sweeteners is Impacting Food Industry
    View more »
ASBPE 2018 National Print Award Winner

Polls

How confident are you in your organization’s hand hygiene protocol?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • Fast, Quantitative Analysis of 1000+ Pesticides Using MRM Mass Spectrometry

View More Whitepapers »

On-Demand Webinars

  • ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Increase Productivity in Your Lab Operation
  • ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Is Your Supply Chain Safe?

View More Webinars »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 2399-1399

Wiley

This site uses cookies: Find out more.