After 25 years of existence, the British Retail Consortium (BRC) still retains a dominant role in U.K. and Europe having 65 percent of the registered sites with 11 percent in North America, according to BRC Global Standards Compliance Program 2016. Although the BRC food safety standard began in the U.K., it is now recognized as a global standard. This standard is recognized as a Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) benchmarked food safety scheme.
Get Paid For Your Thoughts!
- Wiley (Food Quality & Safety’s publisher) is offering $200 to qualified food scientists who participate in research interviews about challenges facing the food industry.
Take the survey >
The current version of BRC is Issue 7, which began officially in July 2015. There are several key modifications/changes for BRC Issue 7 versus Issue 6. Audit protocol’s scopes and exclusions have been tightened to reduce exclusions to an audit. However, excluded products must be manufactured in a segregated area of the facility. Supplier approval is another addition to create a convergence with the U.S. FDA Food Safety Modernization Act requirements under its Foreign Supplier Verification Program.
Also in Issue 7, high-risk suppliers’ food safety programs must have more stringent verification than simply using questionnaires or certificates of analysis. The objective is to have the supplier adhere to a certification in a recognized GFSI scheme, plus take part in first- or third-party audits.
Labeling and packaging control have been tightened also in Issue 7 with a required formalized process in label changes and verification of those changes by the certified site. Another key change is that a BRC certified site must have a documented system to authenticate a facility’s supply chain. A risk assessment program must be performed on all raw material types to assess adulteration of each specific raw material. This needs to be kept updated and current to show dynamic market changes.
BRC has conducted unannounced audits as part of its scheme for some time. If you decide to opt for the unannounced audit scheme, you have to notify your certification body within three months of your last audit date. You then have to decide which option to pursue: Option 1 (full unannounced) versus Option 2 (two-part unannounced audit). Option 2 breaks it down focusing on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) in Part 1. Once corrective actions are completed and verified within a 28-day period, then Part 2 is undertaken, which focuses on systems and documentation. Part 2 can transpire within a 28-day window. My perspective as a former QA manager is that I would opt for Option 1 to get the process done in one full chunk of time. However, I can understand why certain plant operations would opt to truncate the process using Option 2.
The following are several fundamental requirements that involve actual food safety plant issues that I have directly dealt with in my career. However, please keep in mind that all fundamental requirements in BRC are critical to your program’s success and your plant’s certification/recertification.
Senior management commitment and continual improvement. Reviewing programs of my GFSI customers, I find the most disconcerting aspect is the “Groundhog Day” syndrome, namely the same issues or problems are not resolved and are continually reoccurring.
The utilization of Band-Aid remedies are criticized by GFSI and BRC. If non-conformities are repetitive or are resolved without ascertaining “root cause analyses” of non-conformities, the Band-Aid corrective actions do not comply with the ethos of BRC. Specifically, Part 1 Clause 1.1.10 states clearly that senior management “shall ensure that the root causes…have been effectively addressed to prevent reoccurrence.” So, if an auditor finds the same issues being quickly remedied to pass an audit, that in itself is a significant red flag.
Food safety plan review and reassessment. Both the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans and prerequisite programs (PRPs) must be reviewed, adjusted, and updated prior to the announced or unannounced audit. HACCP plans and PRPs both ought to be living, dynamic documents that are continually reviewed, fine-tuned/tweaked, or overhauled depending upon changes in personnel, operations, product portfolio, regulations, and equipment, to name a few.