Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About
    Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
  • On the
    Farm
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the
    Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webinars
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S
    Award
  • Search

A Food Defense Plan Is Good for Business

January 18, 2019 • By David K. Park

  • Tweet
Print-Friendly Version

I am grateful to Food Quality & Safety magazine for the opportunity to share my professional viewpoints and personal experiences on the subject of food defense and its critical importance to overall product security. As a new column, I hope Food Defense will provide subject matter knowledge, insight, and thought-provoking conversation regarding experiences, challenges, and opportunities that confront us in managing food defense responsibilities.

You Might Also Like
  • Food Defense: It’s Everyone’s Job
  • Beefing Up Defense Against Food Adulteration
  • FDA Tackles Terrorism and Adulteration
Explore this issue
February/March 2019

In case food defense-related news has escaped your attention lately, a continuing pattern of intentional adulteration and economic fraud incidents have been reported by both private and government media sources around the globe in 2018. Examples of recent intentional adulteration—economic and otherwise—includes:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Australian-sourced fresh strawberries, intentionally adulterated with sewing needles, with subsequent copycat metal contamination incidents, were discovered in New Zealand and Singapore, causing consumer injury and significantly disrupting global trade;
  • The seizure of 45 tons of quality-expired, chemically-treated tuna from three seafood processing businesses in Spain that marketed and sold the seafood as “fresh;”
  • Two Missouri-based U.S. pet food ingredient companies and several individuals were convicted on a misdemeanor count of selling misbranded pet food ingredients for economic gain (i.e. they substituted inferior ingredients)—the company was ordered to pay $7 million;
  • A man from Belmont, Miss., plead guilty in a U.S. District Court to diverting a possible 180 truckloads of packaged food and beverage products from 10 companies that were destined for destruction or use in animal feed, reselling these same goods for human consumption on the open market and also falsifying records on the purported “destruction” of these goods;
  • A seafood business owner in Newport News, Va., was charged with committing Lacey Act (as amended) and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&CA) (as amended) violations for blending foreign-sourced crab meat with Atlantic blue crab and mislabeling the crabmeat as “Product of USA;” and
  • In December 2018, after a long State food fraud investigation, the New York Attorney General reported the “common practice” of seafood fraud as verified by “rampant” high levels of species mislabeling found in genomically-tested seafood samples taken from New York State supermarket chains.

These examples are what new FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) intentional adulteration regulations, soon to be implemented, address. Regardless of the perpetrator’s motive (e.g., terrorism, sabotage, extortion, counterfeiting, theft, or economically motivated adulteration), intentional or unintentional food tampering can cause serious harm to humans and animals.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The arrival of FDA “Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration” (or as it’s perhaps better known, “Intentional Adulteration (IA) Rule”), originally published as a Final Rule in the Federal Register on May 27, 2016 (81 FR 34166), will soon usher in new regulatory requirements for large food businesses that must follow this rule. This requires certain businesses that manufacture, process/pack, or hold food must not only be already registered with FDA as a Food Facility, but now must meet provisions of Section 415 of the FD&CA, conduct a formal Vulnerability Assessment, and develop and implement a Food Defense Plan. One of seven FSMA rules, the implementation of the IA Rule has not come too soon. An upcoming implementation and compliance date of July 26, 2019, is nearly upon us. If you must comply and haven’t already addressed required facility tasks that underpin the rule, the time to act is now!

IA Rule Basics

Acts of intentional adulteration may take several forms: acts intended to cause wide-scale public health harm, such as acts of terrorism focused on safety of the food supply, and acts of disgruntled employees, consumers, or competitors and their economically motivated adulteration for financial gain. Acts intended to cause wide-scale public health harm are associated with intent to cause significant human morbidity and mortality. Other forms of adulteration are typically not intended to cause wide-scale public health harm, although public harm results from unintended adulteration consequences that are unknown to the perpetrator prior to an attack. Attacks intended to cause public health harm to both humans and animals are appropriately ranked as the highest risk.

Pages: 1 2 3 Single Page

Filed Under: FSMA, Guidelines & Regulations, Home Slider, Regulatory Tagged With: Adulteration, Food Adulteration, food defense, food defense plan, Food Quality, Food SafetyIssue: February/March 2019

You Might Also Like:
  • Food Defense: It’s Everyone’s Job
  • Beefing Up Defense Against Food Adulteration
  • FDA Tackles Terrorism and Adulteration
  • Difficulties in Meeting FSVP Requirements

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

February/March 2019

  • Issue Articles »
  • Current Issue PDF »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Conducting Impactful Internal Audits Beyond the Checklist

How intuitive methods, such as data visualization, enable the ability to both observe and listen objectively.

Previous posts »

Paid Partner Content

PURE Hard Surface

EPA registered food contact surface sanitizer and disinfectant delivers broad spectrum power to eliminate dangerous pathogens

Transport Sanitation Compliance

Disinfection application methodology ensures full coverage for all motor and rail vehicles, and is FSMA compliant

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Sid Wainer and Son Recalls Jansal Valley Dukkah Due to Glass Pieces
    • Birdseed Food Recalls Craft Granola Goldenola Turmeric & Ginger for Undeclared Cashews
    • World Waters Recalls Select 12 Packs Due Soft Plastic Pieces
    • VICS Acquisition Recalls Chicken Due to Undeclared Allergens
    • Frito-Lay Recalls Stacy’s Simply Naked Pita Chips Due to Undeclared Allergen
    View more »
    • Climate Change Could Make Food Less Safe
    • FDA Releases Report on 2018 E. coli Outbreak Tied to Romaine Lettuce
    • Study: Fruit Juices Contain High Levels of Heavy Metals
    • International Push to Improve Food Safety
    • How Consumer Perception of Sweeteners is Impacting Food Industry
    View more »
ASBPE 2018 National Print Award Winner

Polls

How confident are you in your organization’s hand hygiene protocol?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • Fast, Quantitative Analysis of 1000+ Pesticides Using MRM Mass Spectrometry

View More Whitepapers »

On-Demand Webinars

  • ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Increase Productivity in Your Lab Operation
  • ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Is Your Supply Chain Safe?

View More Webinars »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 2399-1399

Wiley

This site uses cookies: Find out more.