Food service professionals have myriad cleaning products to choose from. Cleaning solutions typically used for commercial food service kitchen facilities include grill cleaners, cooktop cleaners, all-purpose cleaners, window cleaners, oven cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers, scrubbing powders, bienzymatic cleaners, stainless steel cleaners/polishes, and more.
Get Paid For Your Thoughts!
- Wiley (Food Quality & Safety’s publisher) is offering $200 to qualified food scientists who participate in research interviews about challenges facing the food industry.
Take the survey >
Cleaning containers are available in various sizes, anywhere from a few pints to 55-gallon containers. Some products have fragrances, such as lemon or berry, while others are fragrance-free. Solutions may be available as a foam, liquid, or powder. Some earned Green certification, while others contain what are considered more harsh ingredients.
Prices can vary based on the sizes of the containers and concentrations of the solutions. In addition, while they may contain similar ingredients, some work better in certain situations and on certain types of surfaces or are easier to work with.
This all means that food service professionals have an exhausting number of things to consider when selecting cleaning solutions to properly clean and maintain kitchens.
What often happens is they purchase the same cleaning solutions repeatedly or select different products from different manufacturers—commonly known as trial-and-error purchasing.
Issues and Concerns with Choosing Cleaning Solutions
Neither method—purchasing the same products over and over and trial-and-error purchasing—is effective. For instance, someone who selects the same products year after year may not be aware that newer products exist that may be more effective and/or less expensive. Chemical manufacturers typically do not introduce a new cleaning solution unless it is an improvement upon a comparable product of their own or from a competitor. It’s simply too expensive and time consuming to manufacture a new cleaning solution that does not stand out in some way. Thus, newer cleaning solutions should always be considered.
Administrators with a trial-and-error purchasing program have the most to lose. It can be costly, especially if some cleaning solutions end up in the closet never to be used again. It can also be dangerous. Cleaning solutions, even Green certified solutions, are made of potent ingredients. Over time, the containers in the closet may release vapors or start to leak. When this happens, it’s possible the ingredients of different products will mix together, creating a major health risk.
Additionally, training is needed for selecting different types of cleaning solutions. This should never be overlooked. Many types of cleaning solutions have different dilution levels, so what works with one product may not work with another. For example, some products are applied to surfaces sparingly with a cloth, while others require more substantial concentrations and must be worked into surfaces using a brush. Therefore, for the safety of the crew as well as the health and cleanliness of the kitchen, training is needed for every different type of cleaning solution used.
Is there a better way to purchase cleaning products that saves time and money, improves cleaning effectiveness, and enhances safety? While it is not a cure-all, conducting a product audit may do the trick.
The ideal way to understand a product audit is to see it in action. Imagine this scenario: A food service facility purchases four cleaners from four different manufacturers, all designed to clean griddles, stovetop grills, and cooktops. Let’s call them products A, B, C, and D.
Working with its janitorial distributor, at least one administrator, and members of the cleaning crew, the facility evaluates the products as follows:
Product A: Second least expensive, ranked third in performance;
Product B: Most expensive, ranked first in performance;
Product C: Second expensive, ranked second in performance; and
Product D: Least expensive, ranked fourth (poorest) in performance.
According to this evaluation, it’s determined:
- While Product D is the least expensive, it is also the least effective, so it will not be purchased again;
- Since Product A does not seem to have any unique attributes, it’s eliminated;
- Product B is the costliest, but is also the most effective; and
- Product C is slightly less costly and almost as effective as Product B, the most costly.
The audit indicates Product C should be the only product selected to perform this cleaning task. It is slightly less costly but still performs well.