Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About
    Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
  • On the
    Farm
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the
    Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webinars
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S
    Award
  • Search

Agricultural Water Safety

April 10, 2019 • By Jesse Staniforth

  • Tweet
Print-Friendly Version

“Taking some samples periodically is just not going to catch unexpected situations,” Dr. LaBorde says. “You can’t ask people to do more unless there are some assurances that what they are actually doing is going to have a public benefit. This E. coli sampling, for instance, sometimes it works, sometimes it predicts, sometimes it doesn’t. But all the studies that have come out say it’s a very poor predictor of human pathogens in water.”

You Might Also Like
  • Organic Food’s Rapid Rise Brings Growing Pains
  • Diversity Farming Needed as Climate Changes
  • Perdue Confirmed as Agriculture Secretary
Explore This Issue
April/May 2019
Also By This Author
  • Speakers on FSMA Draw a Crowd at Northwest Food Expo
ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Phyllis Posy, vice president, strategic services and regulatory affairs, for UV-water-treatment firm Atlantium Technologies, agrees. “Taking a sample is just that—an indication of that time and place,” she says. “How many folks are going to sample right after the rain stops, or when the temperature is coldest or warmest? We don’t catch the extremes and that may be when the contamination is measurable.”

Compounding the problem, says Dr. LaBorde, is the likelihood that sampling will miss contaminated silt in a reservoir or ditch. In the case of the Yuma E. coli outbreak, he recalls, “Some people say it might have been silt at the bottom of a ditch that was stirred up. Bacteria can attach to silt, so you may not have picked them up in the water itself. But if that silt or sediment is upset by mixing and flowing, then it can get into the irrigation system and onto the produce.”

Ozeran and Latack also note the difference between surface-water quality and the presence of pathogens in water sediment. While changes to weather can change the constitution of surface water, “sediment that collects at the bottom of a reservoir, canal, or stream tends to have higher concentrations of bacteria than the water itself. With a rainstorm causing hillside runoff or flooding, sediment and the bacteria living there can become suspended in the water. Turbid water after a storm therefore may have a higher concentration of bacteria than it had before the storm.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

While Ozeran and Latack encourage sampling as frequently as possible, and recording general site conditions while sampling (such as whether a flock of birds has recently been in the reservoir) in order to be informed about conditions affecting water quality, they acknowledge that available technology doesn’t allow constant monitoring, making constant measures for the moment impossible.

United Fresh’s Dr. McEntire puts it even more bluntly: “The bottom line is that there is no good testing protocol.”

Drinking Water Is Not Irrigation Water

Dr. LaBorde says a foundational problem with discussions about water safety is that standards applied to drinking water are not applied to irrigation water, with good reason. Initial approaches to E. coli were based on incidences of sudden contamination such as a baby’s diaper in a small lake, which is difficult to apply to irrigation.

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Transferring [an approach grounded in public health epidemiology] over to water that gets on a plant, that’s different to your exposure when you’re swimming and your mouth is open and you’re gulping water,” Dr. LaBorde adds. He notes that research on this subject is ongoing, with researchers trying to improve the means of quickly identifying fecal contamination. “But it’s very frustrating for everybody because the systems just aren’t that good right now, and while there is a lot of research to improve that, it takes time. I don’t think there is a good answer right now. The thinking has been, ‘Well this is good enough for now.’ We’ve got to do something.”

Meanwhile, says Posy, it’s unwise to attempt to apply EPA drinking water standards to irrigation due to volume alone. She stresses that EPA has zero responsibility to oversee agricultural water, since its domain is limited to drinking water.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Home Slider, On the Farm, Regulatory, Safety & Sanitation Tagged With: Agricultural water, agriculture, fresh fruit, irrigationIssue: April/May 2019

You Might Also Like:
  • Organic Food’s Rapid Rise Brings Growing Pains
  • Diversity Farming Needed as Climate Changes
  • Perdue Confirmed as Agriculture Secretary
  • FSMA Compliance: Water Usage for Produce

About Jesse Staniforth

Jesse Staniforth is a Montreal-based freelance journalist, writer, and editor covering a variety of different beats. He reports regularly on Indigenous issues for The Nation magazine, serving the Cree Nation of Eeyou Istchee, as well on Information Security issues for SC Magazine. His stories have appeared in a wide variety of other publications, from the Toronto Star and Metro News through AskMen.com and University Affairs. After editing several thousands of pages' worth of food preparation training materials for a hospitality industry group, he grew fascinated with the subject of food safety. Reach him at jbstaniforth@gmail.com.

View more by this author»

Comments

  1. Michael Brodsky says

    April 19, 2019 at 11:17 am

    Fruits and vegetables grown in the open fields, while not naturally contaminated, are subject to contamination from birds and other animals. In addition the use of contaminated surface or ground water for irrigation or washing is especially problematic. During harvesting and processing cross-contamination of produce can easily occur between products, as well as by inadequate worker hygiene. Since such foods are often eaten raw. Without effective intervention strategies in the processing plant, they can and do result in foodborne illness. Other than properly washing and peeling (when feasible) produce before consumption, consumers have little protection. Better and more effective scientifically proven safe intervention strategies such as UV disinfection, irradiation or chemical treatments etc. must be adopted by produce processors. In addition, more attention needs to be paid to plant sanitation and environmental monitoring.

    Reply
  2. Tony Russo says

    April 20, 2019 at 10:20 am

    I agree with Phyllis Posy that “there is a real disconnect between the food safety community and the water safety community, both on the government and food processor/supplier/grower sides.” I have worked for both communities and can unequivocal say that there is a lack of understanding and dialogue between these communities who are dedicated to protect public health. Everyone knows that inclement weather (rain, snow melt) will increase the microbial load in surface waters. Sampling and testing water can be misleading or it can be a good indicator of the sanitary conditions of the surface water. It all depends on the sampling conditions and frequency of the sampling plan. Single samples are just that—”an indication of that time and place.” But, if well water can not be used for irrigation purposes due to geographic considerations, then a more robust sampling plan should be implemented. Regulations prohibiting when surface water can be applied could be referenced to the unsanitary bacterial load of the impounded surface water. We use this standard for public recreational water in every state. This would be a step in the right direction to improve public health.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

October/November 2019

  • Issue Articles »
  • Current Issue PDF »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Managing Change as a Food Safety Professional

… [Read More]

Previous posts »

Paid Partner Content

Avoiding Overwhelming Product Recall Costs

Innovative food safety inspection systems are being developed in Germany. Learn more about the latest technologies from Bizerba and benefit from our free guidelines ensuring consistent food production safety.

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Cay Thi Queentrees Food USA Recalls Poultry Products
    • Padrino Foods, LLC Recalls Beef Tamales
    • Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc. Recalls Poultry Products
    • Rastelli Bros., Inc. Recalls Meat Products
    View more »
    • Researchers Uncover Science Behind Using UV Light to Disarm Pathogens
    • In Memoriam: Daniel Y. C. Fung, PhD
    • E. coli Illness Linked to Romaine Lettuce Expands
    • Salmonella Outbreak and Ground Beef Recall Stir Transparency Debate
    • FDA Extends Deadline for Supply-Chain Approval
    View more »

Polls

How interested is your company in cannabis testing for its food/beverage products?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • Food Authenticity Testing with Agilent 6546 LC/Q-TOF and MassHunter Classifier

View More Whitepapers »

On-Demand Webinars

  • Reduce Non-Recyclable Materials
  • Why a Food Safety Culture Is Critical to Your Business

View More Webinars »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Targeted list rental/3rd Party emails / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 2399-1399

Wiley

This site uses cookies: Find out more.