Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Privacy Policy
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webinars
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S Award
  • Search

Executive Order on Water Rule

March 17, 2017 • By Jesse Staniforth

  • Tweet
Print-Friendly Version

With one of the executive orders that have characterized the beginning of his term, President Donald Trump ordered the EPA on February 28 to begin reconsidering the Waters of the United States Rule (WOTUS), also known as the Clean Water Rule, in order to “[rescind] or [revise] the rule, as appropriate and consistent with law.”

You Might Also Like
  • FDA Suggests Reductions in Fluoride Added to Bottled Water
  • Quest to Label GMOs Marches on in Washington
  • Federal Bill Aims to Make Expiration Labels Clearer
Also by this Author
  • Personal Devices Pose Contamination Risk in Food Facilities

WOTUS has been a hot-button topic since it came into force in 2015, particularly among agricultural and farm-business groups who felt it represented unreasonable federal control over farmlands.

In a press release following the President’s order, American Soybean Association president Ron Moore celebrated the decision, saying, “Our concern with the rule has always been about the non-specific and overly broad nature of the rule as written, and never about the paramount goal of cleaner water and more environmentally sound farming practices.”

Explaining that farmers rely on clean water and soil to safeguard their crops and their livelihoods, Moore argued that they need “a seat at the table” instead of rules imposed from above.

“This rule sought to expand EPA’s authority into places where it was either unnecessary or duplicative, without any reasonable justification for doing so,” Moore said. “We look forward to collaborating with President Trump, Administrator Pruitt, and others in the administration and Congress to pursue clean water goals in a way that respects both the environment and the farmer as an environmentalist.”

What will follow, however, is unknown, as the classification of water laid down in WOTUS is now up for question. WOTUS followed on years of confusion about the applicability of the 1972 Clean Water Act, which regulated what could be allowed into the “waters of the United States,” but did not classify which waters were considered as such. WOTUS was an attempt to provide a piece of legislation that would answer all questions about which waters constituted those of the U.S. Following a puzzling split Supreme Court decision in 2006, those wetlands subject to the Clean Water Act and requiring permits for development became determined on a case-by-case basis. WOTUS was an attempt to solve that confusion by deciding which waters were covered by the Act across the board.

“WOTUS for example helped to make it clear that small streams, but not road ditches, are protected by the Clean Water Act,” explains Michigan State University’s Water Resources Education professional Monica Day. “Ditches and other drainage projects are essential for protecting property. Likewise, undisturbed small streams contribute to maintaining water quality.  This clarity of the rule is important for maintaining clean water while at the same time allowing the routine maintenance needed for flood protection.”

For Day, WOTUS was about recognizing that a watershed is not only its navigable rivers and tributaries, but also its many smaller land-water contact areas. It is these that are responsible, Day says, for “providing the physical, chemical, and biological processing needed for pollution removal and groundwater recharge. For the Clean Water Act to do its job of protecting the waters of the state, i.e. ensuring waters are fishable, swimmable, and drinkable, it has to be able to protect the parts of the watershed that are essential for delivering clean water.”

Strangely, a Mother Jones report on the subject claims that the Clean Water Act and WOTUS actually exempted agriculture, and notes that a Congressional Research Service report analyzing WOTUS concluded in January that WOTUS, “makes no change to and does not affect existing statutory and regulatory exclusions: exemptions for normal farming, ranching, and silviculture activities such as plowing, seeding, and cultivation.”

A proposed change by the Obama administration that might have included farm ditches caused confusion, the story notes, but goes on to point out that proposal was withdrawn two years ago.

Pages: 1 2 Single Page

Filed Under: eUpdate, Guidelines & Regulations, Regulatory

You Might Also Like:
  • FDA Suggests Reductions in Fluoride Added to Bottled Water
  • Quest to Label GMOs Marches on in Washington
  • Federal Bill Aims to Make Expiration Labels Clearer
  • Americans Want Required Food Labels Even if They Don’t Read Them

About Jesse Staniforth

Jesse Staniforth is a Montreal-based freelance journalist, writer, and editor covering a variety of different beats. He reports regularly on Indigenous issues for The Nation magazine, serving the Cree Nation of Eeyou Istchee, as well on Information Security issues for SC Magazine. His stories have appeared in a wide variety of other publications, from the Toronto Star and Metro News through AskMen.com and University Affairs. After editing several thousands of pages' worth of food preparation training materials for a hospitality industry group, he grew fascinated with the subject of food safety. Reach him at jbstaniforth@gmail.com.

View more by this author»

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

April/May 2018

  • Issue Articles »
  • Digital Edition »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Challenges in Localizing Global Data Systems

As promising as big data systems may appear, numerous regions are encountering glitches in operation.

Previous posts »

Paid Partner Content

PURE Hard Surface

EPA registered food contact surface sanitizer and disinfectant delivers broad spectrum power to eliminate dangerous pathogens

Transport Sanitation Compliance

Disinfection application methodology ensures full coverage for all motor and rail vehicles, and is FSMA compliant

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Ziegenfelder Recalls Ice Pops because of Listeria
    • McCall Farms Recalls Canned Spinach Due to Undeclared Peanut Allergen
    • TruPet Recalls Beef Topper Meal Enhancer for Dogs Due to Salmonella
    • Vitakraft Recalls Pet Formula Due to Salmonella
    • K9 Natural Recalls Frozen Pet Food Because of Listeria
    View more »
    • Plant-Killing Pests and Diseases Have Ally in Climate Change
    • Food-Related Illness for Prisoners Substantial, Report Says
    • Insect Farms Gear Up to Feed Global Protein Demand
    • U.S. Recalls More Than 200 Million Eggs over Salmonella Fears
    • Same Smoky Flavor, Less Carcinogens
    View more »
2016 APEX Awards Winner ASBPE 2016 Regional Print Award Winner

Polls

Should Salmonella be considered an “adulterant” in raw chicken product?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • Ambient Intelligence – Transforming the Food Industry

View More Whitepapers »

Digital Editions

Prefer reading our issues digitally? Then flip through the pages of our print issues on your digital device!

View Digital Archive »

On-Demand Webinars

  • UPCOMING: Applying Risk-Based Thinking to Food Safety
  • UPCOMING: Detecting Veterinary Drug Residues

View More Webinars »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 2399-1399

Wiley