“‘Horsemeat in lasagna or will they Findus, as one horse said to another’ was a running joke in Europe a couple years ago,” says Ivar Vågsholm, DVM, PhD, a professor of food safety in the Department of Biomedicine and Veterinary Public Health at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. “The joke arose from the horsemeat scandal, which was a real eye opener on the issue of food fraud and adulteration of foods within the European Union (EU).”
Explore this issueApril/May 2015
Also by this Author
No horsin’ around, it was arguably the most prominent and widespread European food fraud scandal in recent years. The tale erupted in mid-January 2013 when Irish food inspectors announced that they had found horsemeat in frozen beef burgers. Subsequently, the U.K. informed the European Commission (EC) on Feb. 8, 2013 that a U.K. company, Findus UK, which bills itself as is one of Europe’s largest frozen food and seafood companies with leading brands, had been selling beef lasagna supplied by a French company, (Comigel-Tavola Luxembourg) which tests showed contained between 80 percent to100 percent horsemeat.
It was determined the horsemeat originated in a Romanian abattoir and was provided to Comigel-Tavola, which had reportedly stipulated that all of its meat orders exclusively required 100 percent certified beef, via a meat-processing company called Spanghero based in southwestern France.
At that time, French Consumer Affairs Minister Benoît Hamon stated the meat had left Romania clearly and correctly labeled as horse and that it was afterwards that it was knowingly relabeled as beef by Spanghero. It is purported that financial gain is behind this fraudulent activity, given that horsemeat is much cheaper than other meats, especially beef, in some countries.
Findus UK did recall all its products that were impacted by the fraudulently labeled horsemeat and issued a public apology.
Other prominent food companies were also impacted by mislabeled horsemeat.
As an initial response, European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy Tonio Borg announced, at the beginning of March 2013, a five-point action plan to be carried out over the short, medium, and longer term.
Relative to point one, food fraud, the EC has, as it highlights on its website, completed mapping of existing tools and mechanisms to fight food fraud, including developing synergies and contacts among competent authorities. An ongoing effort is underway to ensure a procedure for the rapid exchange of information and alerts in cases of violations that may constitute a fraud.
Point two, a testing program protocol has been completed. This testing assesses and presents the results of the ongoing DNA monitoring, along with ongoing monitoring of horsemeat for residues of phenylbutazone and, if necessary, undertakes appropriate follow-up measures.
Point three, a horse passport program has been completed that includes rules and controls on the identification of horses and the measures that must be taken to prevent that meat from unidentified horses enter the food chain, in particular by verifying how the passport of treated horses is completed following administration of phenylbutazone.
Point four, official controls have been developed and implemented, and penalties have been developed. This includes coordinated testing programs in specific cases, in particular in case of fraud.
Point five, origin labeling, is in place and ongoing. The intent is to prevent misleading use of voluntary origin labeling in foods.
More specifically, EU actions on fraud, as clarified for Food Quality & Safety by the EC, include 1.) the creation of an EU Food Fraud Network comprised of representatives from the EC, member states, plus Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland, 2.) the development (work still on-going) of a dedicated IT tool, similar to the RASFF (Rapid Alert System for Feed and Food), which enables the members of the network to rapidly exchange information and data on potential cases of cross-border fraud, 3.) specialized training offered from 2014 to food inspectors, police and customs officers, and judicial authorities concerning new investigation/control techniques related to food fraud and more effective cross-agencies cooperation at national level, 4.) special attention being given at the EU level to develop enhanced laboratory analysis capabilities, through the pooling of knowledge and resources available in the member states and the development of specialized research programs, and 5.) a better coordination at the EU level of all services dealing with matters relating to food fraud.