Food Quality & Safety
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Food Quality & Safety‘s Mission
    • Contact Us
    • Authors
    • Manage Subscription
    • Advertise
    • Magazine Archive
    • Copyright Information
    • Privacy Policy
  • Safety & Sanitation
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Hygiene
    • Pest Control
    • Clean In Place
    • Allergens
    • Sanitizing
    • Training
  • Quality
    • Authenticity
    • Textures & Flavors
    • Labeling
    • Shelf Life
    • Outsourcing
    • Auditing/Validation
    • Supplier Programs
  • Testing
    • Seafood
    • Dairy
    • Hormones/Antibiotics
    • Produce
    • Ingredients
    • Beverages
    • Meat & Poultry
    • Animal Food
  • In the Lab
    • Lab Software
    • Pathogen Control
    • Physical Properties
    • Contaminants
    • Measurement
    • Sampling
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
    • Information Technology
    • Plant Design
    • Foreign Object Control
    • Temperature/Humidity
    • Packaging
    • Transportation
    • Tracking & Traceability
  • Food Service & Retail
    • Cleaning & Sanitizing
    • Stock Management
    • Hygiene
    • Food Preparation
    • Allergens
    • Education
    • Temperature Monitoring
  • Regulatory
    • FSMA
    • Guidelines & Regulations
    • Recalls
  • Resources
    • Whitepaper
    • Webcasts
    • Video
    • Events
    • Food Library
    • Jobs
  • FQ&S Award
  • Search

Controlling Listeria through Manufacturer Intervention

April 1, 2006 • By Catherine W. Donnelly

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Recall of food products contaminated by Listeria monocytogenes are on the rise, due in part to federal regulatory agencies’ increased scrutiny of food processing plants. Each year in the United States, L. monocytogenes causes approximately 2,500 cases of illness, which result in 500 deaths (Mead, 1999). Susceptible persons include pregnant women and those with immune system compromise due to cancer, organ transplant therapy, kidney disease, diabetes, aging and AIDS.

You Might Also Like
  • What to Know about Listeria
  • Listeria Eliminator Wins European FoodTec Award
  • Be Ready to Beat Listeria
Explore this issue
April/May 2006

Persons with compromised immune systems account for approximately 20 percent of the United States population, and this percentage continues to rise. The key reason for the heightened regulatory focus on L. monocytogenes is that it causes a higher rate of hospitalization than any other foodborne pathogen: 95 percent of the individuals who acquire Listeriosis are hospitalized, and this disease is the leading cause of death from a foodborne pathogen (Mead, 1999).

An excellent surveillance system is operational in the United States, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has achieved tremendous advances in disease surveillance through PulseNet and FoodNet. This enhanced surveillance, however, means an increased likelihood of tracing sources of infection to food product manufacturers. The good news for the food industry is that cases of Listeriosis are stable or on the decline due largely to food manufacturer intervention and prevention efforts.

When comparing data from 1996 to 1998, the incidence of Listeriosis in the United States declined by 40 percent in 2004 (CDC, 2005). Control of L. monocytogenes requires a focused commitment to maintaining the highest levels of plant sanitation and contamination prevention of food being processed. Risk assessment by FDA and USDA has identified those foods at highest risk for transmission of L. monocytogenes to susceptible persons (Health and Human Services [HHS]/USDA, 2003). Particularly for those manufacturers of ready-to-eat (RTE) foods that support high level growth of L. monocytogenes, there is a critical need for environmental control, which is best achieved by frequent environmental monitoring.

Species of Listeria, L. monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, and Listeria welshimeri, are very common and can be found almost anywhere in the environment. As indicator organisms, Listeria is useful in assessing the potential presence of L. monocytogenes in the processing plant environment. During food processing and manufacturing, there is the potential for L. monocytogenes to be continually introduced into that environment. The challenge for food manufacturers is to direct efforts to prevent the growth and establishment of L. monocytogenes within the plant environment through appropriate controls. These include good manufacturing practices (GMPs), sanitation and employee training. It is also critical to have in place a system that verifies these control procedures are functioning. This is most effectively accomplished through an environmental monitoring program. The contamination of food contact surfaces poses the greatest threat to product contamination. Contamination from other areas of the plant can serve as indirect sources of product contamination. Frequent testing is imperative to ensure that routine cleaning and sanitation procedures are working. Absence of Listeria is the desired outcome of this verification.

Failure to control L. monocytogenes may result in the establishment of niches, including biofilms, after which routine cleaning and sanitizing efforts become ineffective. Only through sampling and testing can identification of niche areas be accomplished. If these areas are left unchecked, they will serve as a source of product contamination (Tompkin, 2000).

Numerous studies have shown that colonization of L. monocytogenes in food processing plants and establishment of niches can lead to continuous contamination of food during processing. Investigation of a multistate outbreak of Listeriosis, occurring in 2000 and linked to delicatessen turkey meat, revealed contamination by a strain of L. monocytogenes, which may have persisted in the incriminated processing plant for at least 12 years, and caused intermittent contamination during that time period (Olsen, et. al. 2005). Focus sampling and testing efforts to niche areas where resident strains of L. monocytogenes may persist, such as drains, floors and mats (Tompkin, 2002).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 Single Page

Filed Under: In the Lab, Pathogen Control, Produce, Recalls, Regulatory, Testing Tagged With: cross contamination, E. coli, Food, Food Quality, food quality and safety, Food Safety, Food testing, Listeria, Outbreaks, pathogen, Pathogens, Plate Technology, Production, Quality, Recall, Regulatory, Safety, TestingIssue: April/May 2006

You Might Also Like:
  • What to Know about Listeria
  • Listeria Eliminator Wins European FoodTec Award
  • Be Ready to Beat Listeria
  • Controlling Listeria in Delis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current Issue

December/January 2017

  • Issue Articles »
  • Digital Edition »
  • Subscribe »
  • Follow Us:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Food Quality & Safety Blog  

Ripple Effect of Food Culture

Family eating dinner

The evolution of food culture leaves an impact on global food safety and quality systems

  • Recall News
  • Industry News
    • Carriage House Creations Recalls Sauces Due to Undeclared Soy and Peanuts
    • Atlas Meat Co. Recalls Pork Products Due To Misbranding
    • Sierra Nevada Recalls Beer Due to Packaging Flaw
    • Specialty Commodities Recalls Almonds Due to Undeclared Allergen
    • Athens Baking Recalls Bread Due to Undeclared Milk
    View more »
    • U.K. Scientists Give Cancer Warning on Overdone Chips, Toast
    • France to Review Food Whitener Additive for Health Risks
    • How Smart Technology Can Improve Food Safety
    • Panera Bread Removes Artificial Ingredients
    • Metal Detectable Tools Avoid Physical Contamination
    View more »
2016 APEX Awards Winner ASBPE 2016 Regional Print Award Winner
  • Most Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Recent
    1. 5 Essential Tips for Effective Sanitation
    2. Personal Hygiene and Food Safety Tips
    3. The Microbiology of Cereals and Cereal Products
    4. 7 Steps to an Effective Pest Management Program
    5. Avoiding Physical Contamination

    • Food Regulations—What is the Current Scenario in India? (21)
    • Personal Hygiene and Food Safety Tips (6)
    • Microbiological Tests and Kits: The Latest Advances (4)
    • Keeping E. coli O121 Out of Flour (4)
    • 5 Essential Tips for Effective Sanitation (3)
    • Handling Food Safety Issues in Paradise: Part 2—Central America
    • Plant Proteins Grow in Popularity
    • U.K. Scientists Give Cancer Warning on Overdone Chips, Toast
    • France to Review Food Whitener Additive for Health Risks
    • How Smart Technology Can Improve Food Safety

Polls

Does your organization incorporate efforts to reduce food waste?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Whitepapers

  • A Best Practices Guide to Food Safety Management

View More Whitepapers »

Digital Editions

iconPrefer reading our publications digitally? The digital issues are replicas of our print publication and available to view free of charge.

View Digital Archive »

On-Demand Webcasts

  • ON-DEMAND: Rapid Methods for the Detection of Food Fraud and Authenticity
  • ON-DEMAND: Mitigating Risk in the Supply Chain — Key factors to Consider for Food Safety Outside Your 4 Walls

View More Webcasts »

Food Quality & Safety (formerly Food Quality) is the established authority in delivering strategic and tactical approaches necessary for quality assurance, safety, and security in the food and beverage industry.

Advertise / Subscribe / Contact Us / Privacy Policy

ASBPE Award Winner

Copyright © 2000–2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. All rights reserved. ISSN 1092-7514

Wiley

Subscribe to the magazine
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.